Fascinating new insights on why the Endurance sank, with implications for Shackleton’s legacy: A broken rudder wasn’t what doomed the Endurance, new analysis suggests
Shackleton blamed the sinking of the Endurance on the destruction of its rudder; for more than a century, historians accepted this explanation. Now, an analysis suggests that structural weakness caused the Endurance to sink, and that Shackleton knew about his ship’s failings, according to Dr. Jukka Tuhkuri, a professor in the department of energy and mechanical engineering at Aalto University in Finland. Tuhkuri reported the findings Monday in the journal Polar Record.
I have been interested in Ernest Shackleton ever since reading South and The Heart of the Antarctic. While it would be unfortunate if this meant a major misjudgment on his part, Tuhkuri’s research demonstrates how new data points revealed by different kinds of analysis (in this case, structural engineering) can help inform historical narrative and add nuance to lionized figures.





Leave a reply to Cyberkitten Cancel reply